Five Years Later: A Father Still Fighting for His Son

A collage image showing a thoughtful older man with glasses and a gray beard, alongside a younger man sitting on a bench by a lake, overlayed with the text 'A Father Still Fighting for His Son, Five Years Later'.

By Michael Phillips | Father & Co.

Five years ago, Wayne Lynch’s life divided into two parts:

Before March 26, 2021.
And everything after.

On that night at the Virginia Beach Oceanfront — a night already marked by chaos and multiple shootings — Wayne’s 25-year-old son, Donovon Lynch, was shot and killed by a Virginia Beach police officer.

The legal system would later call it self-defense.

But for Wayne Lynch, the story never ended with a grand jury report.

It began there.


A Son, Not a Headline

In the years since his death, Donovon Lynch has been described in official documents as an individual encountered during a chaotic emergency scene.

But to Wayne, Donovon was never an “individual at a hedge line.”

He was his son.

A former college athlete.
A young business owner.
A mentor in youth basketball circles.
A man preparing to help organize a basketball camp in the community before he was killed.

Wayne speaks about Donovon not in legal language, but in memory — the kind only a parent carries.

“My son didn’t get to tell his side,” he has said in interviews. “He didn’t get a day in court.”

Five years later, Wayne is still fighting to defend his son’s name — not just to question how he died, but to insist on who he was.


What the System Concluded

In November 2021, a Special Grand Jury concluded there was no probable cause to charge Officer Solomon Simmons. After reviewing extensive video footage, witness testimony, and forensic evidence, the grand jury determined the officer acted in justifiable self-defense.

The criminal case was closed.

The officer was not charged.

That conclusion stands.

But the Lynch family’s position has never been that the system failed to review evidence.

It is that the system failed to restore trust.


The Questions That Wouldn’t Go Away

Wayne Lynch has repeated the same concerns for five years:

  • Why was the officer’s body camera not activated at the critical moment?
  • Were clear warnings given?
  • Did Donovon know he was encountering a police officer?
  • Why was Donovon moved after he was shot?
  • Could medical intervention have been faster?

The Special Grand Jury addressed many of these issues and rejected allegations of wrongdoing.

But Wayne has never accepted that the answers feel complete.

For a father, “no probable cause” does not erase the moment his son fell.


The Attorney — and the Attempt to Shift the Focus

The Special Grand Jury report included an additional recommendation: investigation of the family’s attorney, Jeff Reichert, for possible perjury.

For Wayne Lynch, that moment felt like something else was happening — that the focus had shifted away from the death of his son and onto the credibility of the person advocating for him.

Reichert was later investigated and cleared. No perjury charges were filed.

The clearance mattered.

It meant that the cloud cast over the family’s legal advocate did not result in prosecution.

But for Wayne, the episode reinforced a painful pattern: every time he pushed harder, the system pushed back.


The Civilian Review Board — and Another Silence

Recently, Virginia Beach’s Independent Citizen Review Board reviewed the case.

The board failed to reach consensus.

No findings.
No recommendations.
No formal advisory opinion.

To city officials, the process functioned within its rules.

To Wayne Lynch, it felt like another door closing without answers.

A civilian oversight body exists to help restore public confidence.

When it cannot reach agreement in one of the most consequential cases in recent city history, what message does that send to a father who has waited five years?


The Fight for Innocence

Wayne Lynch’s advocacy is not abstract.

He is not arguing technical standards of probable cause.

He is fighting for his son’s innocence.

Donovon was never charged with a crime that night.

He never stood trial.

He never had the opportunity to explain what he was doing in those final seconds.

The city’s civil defense frames the situation as chaotic, as split-second, as a perception of threat.

Wayne frames it differently.

He sees a young man with a future — one whose life ended without the kind of clarity that brings peace to a family.

Five years later, he is still asking why.


A Father’s Calendar

Every anniversary reopens the wound.

Every headline replays the night.

Every institutional decision — the grand jury finding, the perjury investigation, the review board deadlock — becomes another milestone in a timeline Wayne never asked to live through.

He has channeled his grief into action, helping create the Donovon & Wayne Lynch Foundation to honor his son’s memory and continue community engagement in Hampton Roads.

But advocacy is not closure.

It is endurance.


What Five Years Means

Five years is long enough for institutions to declare finality.

It is not long enough for a father to stop fighting.

The legal system has spoken.

The officer was cleared.

The attorney was cleared.

The review board could not decide.

Yet Wayne Lynch still wakes up without his son.

And in his mind, until the answers feel complete — until the public record feels reconciled with the man he knew — the case is not over.


The Divide That Remains

There are residents of Virginia Beach who believe the Special Grand Jury’s findings are definitive.

There are others who believe oversight mechanisms did not go far enough.

And there is Wayne Lynch — who lives every day in the space between legality and loss.

Five years later, this case is no longer just about what happened in seconds at the Oceanfront.

It is about whether a city can look a grieving father in the eye and say, with moral clarity, that everything possible was done.

Right now, Wayne Lynch does not believe that answer has been given.

And until it is — he will continue to fight for his son.

Additional commentary on VABayNews — Five Years Later: Review Board Deadlock Reignites Debate Over Donovon Lynch Shooting


Logo design featuring 'FATHER & CO.' with a lighthouse symbol in a circular format, navy and gold color scheme.

Keep Father & Co. Free

Father & Co. exists to support parents navigating separation, custody, and systems that are often confusing, isolating, or overwhelming. This work is grounded in lived experience, careful research, and respect for the real stakes families face.

If this article helped you feel less alone, better informed, or more grounded, reader support helps keep these resources free and available to others who need them.

👉 Support Father & Co.

Need help reviewing or organizing court or formal documents?

Father & Co. offers non-legal document review and organization for people representing themselves. This includes clarity, structure, neutral tone, and timeline organization — not legal advice or representation.

👉 View Services

Have a story, experience, or resource to share?

Submissions are reviewed with care and discretion. We respect privacy and handle sensitive information responsibly.

👉 Submit a Story


Discover more from Fatherand.Co

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Michael Phillips

Michael Phillips is a journalist, editor, creator, IT consultant, and father. He writes about politics, family-court reform, and civil rights.

More From Author

When an Allegation Becomes a Weapon

Supreme Court Weighs In on Parental Rights and Gender Policy Dispute

Leave a Reply

About
Father & Co. is an independent journalism and advocacy platform dedicated to rebuilding trust between parents, children, and the systems meant to protect them.
We report the stories others won’t—on family courts, child welfare, disability rights, and constitutional accountability.
Learn More