A Father & Co. Initiative
Parents are the primary stewards of their children’s lives.
Project STEWARDSHIP exists to examine how technology, policy, and institutions are quietly reshaping childhood — often without parents’ consent or involvement.
We focus on intact families and everyday parenting decisions, asking a simple but urgent question:
Who is making choices about children — and should they be?
From social media limits and school policies to medical consent and court rulings, Project STEWARDSHIP explores how parental authority is eroded long before the child welfare system ever appears.
This project is for parents who want clarity, not panic.
Boundaries, not bans.
Responsibility, not control.
→ Read our Mission & Scope
→ Explore Project STEWARDSHIP reporting
The Fracturing Foundation
The decline in birth rates and marriage in the U.S. has led to significant societal issues, including rising juvenile crime and increased government dependence. With one in three children growing up in single-parent households, the structural advantages of intact families are lost, prompting a growing welfare state as a substitute for family support.
Months Missing: The Tristan King Case Shows How the System Failed a Child
Tristan King, a nine-year-old boy missing for nearly six months in Baltimore, was ultimately found alive, raising serious concerns about systemic failures in child welfare. Despite multiple agencies’ involvement, gaps in communication and oversight allowed this tragedy to occur. Parents fear this situation highlights broader issues, questioning the effectiveness of promises for reform.
Luka Dončić’s Custody Fight: A Reminder That Fame Doesn’t Protect Fathers
Luka Dončić, a renowned basketball player, is embroiled in a custody dispute after separating from his fiancée, Anamaria Goltes. This situation, complicated by international jurisdiction and media scrutiny, highlights the challenges fathers face during custody battles. Ultimately, it underscores the universal struggle for parental involvement in children’s lives.
What the Defendant Admitted Under Oath
The Hornbeck deposition highlights the complexities of parental custody disputes in family court, where personal narratives often clash. Under oath, Sarah Hornbeck addressed significant past events, including a 2018 arrest and disputes over child relocation. This case illustrates the challenges parents face in revealing the truth amidst prolonged litigation.
Five Years Later: A Father Still Fighting for His Son
Five years after Donovon Lynch was shot and killed at the Virginia Beach Oceanfront, his father is still fighting — not just for accountability, but for his son’s name.
The legal case may be closed. The review board may be deadlocked. But for Wayne Lynch, the questions have never stopped.
This is not just a…
Maryland Father Indicted in International Parental Kidnapping Case
A Howard County man faces international parental kidnapping charges for removing his child from the U.S. in violation of custody rights under the International Parental Kidnapping Crime Act. This case highlights the complexity of cross-border custody disputes, where actions can quickly escalate from family court to federal prosecution, impacting all involved.
Georgia’s New Child Support Guidelines: Well-Intended Change, Uncertain Impact
On January 1, 2026, Georgia revamped its child support calculation, integrating parenting time and low-income adjustments directly into the formula. This aims to enhance fairness and adaptability in co-parenting. However, concerns arise about potential unintended consequences, clarity, and stability for families, necessitating careful evaluation of these changes.
Utah’s OMS Law Shows How Family Court Reform Can Actually Happen
Utah’s OMS Law reforms family courts by necessitating evidence for abuse allegations in custody cases, aiming to prevent wrongful penalization and uphold parental rights. This law is gaining national attention as a model for fostering fairness in custody disputes while resisting trends of automatic action based on unverified claims, demonstrating achievable change in family court…
When “Parental Rights” Stop Protecting Families—and Start Endangering Children
The Texas Supreme Court case, In the Interest of K.N. et al., raises critical questions about parental rights versus child protection. Activists argue for limited state intervention until proven harm occurs, which risks neglecting children’s safety. Conservatives must acknowledge that protecting vulnerable children is essential to uphold family values and prevent abuse.
When the Court Redefines Marriage: What New Mexico’s Ruling Means for Families and Children
The recent decision by the New Mexico Supreme Court to overturn the state’s so-called “broken marriages” law marks a significant shift in how the legal system treats divorce—and, by extension, families and children caught in the middle. Supporters of the ruling argue it modernizes family law and removes outdated barriers to divorce. But from a…